Error loading page.
Try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, there may be a network issue, and you can use our self test page to see what's preventing the page from loading.
Learn more about possible network issues or contact support for more help.

The Worst Thing We've Ever Done

One Juror's Reckoning with Racial Injustice

ebook
1 of 1 copy available
1 of 1 copy available
In May of 1976, twenty-four-year-old Carol Menaker was impaneled with eleven others on a jury in the trial of Freddy Burton, a young Black prison inmate charged with the grisly murders of two white wardens inside Philadelphia's Holmesburg Prison. After being sequestered for twenty-one days, the jury voted to convict Mr. Burton, who was then sentenced to life in prison without parole.
For more than forty years, Menaker did what she could to put the intensely emotional experience of the sequestration and trial behind her, rarely speaking of it to others and avoiding jury service when at all possible. But the arrival of a jury summons at her home in Northern California in 2017 set her on a path to unravel the painful experience of sequestration and finally ask the question: What ever happened to Freddy Burton—and is it possible that my youth and white privilege were what led me to convict him of murder?
The Worst Thing We've Ever Done is Menaker's inspirational account of journeying back in time to uncover the personal bias that may have led her to judge someone whose shoes she never could have walked in.
  • Creators

  • Publisher

  • Release date

  • Formats

  • Languages

  • Reviews

    • Library Journal

      March 1, 2023

      Menaker was 24 years old in 1976 when she served on a sequestered jury in Philadelphia for 21 days. The defendant, a Black man named Freddy Burton, stood trial for the murder of two white prison wardens. He was convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole. Menaker, a middle-class white woman, had little prior contact with Black people. She writes about her experience of sequestration, with its attendant isolation, hotel living, bad food, and supervised interactions with her fellow jurors. Primarily, she wrestles with her feelings of ambiguity about Burton's conviction, particularly with the benefit of hindsight and research that provides new context. The author examines the backgrounds and political motivations of the major players involved in the trial, including the judge, mayor, and attorneys. She also delves into Burton's background and notes that he converted to Islam and changed his name to Muhammed while incarcerated at Holmesburg Prison, where he spent an inordinate amount of time in solitary confinement; the prison is described as inhumane, overcrowded, dangerous, and characterized by callous treatment. Menaker's book is a reckoning of sorts, and her quest to find nuance will make readers contemplate how many other convictions should be reassessed. VERDICT Recommended for readers interested in criminal-justice reform.--Barrie Olmstead

      Copyright 2023 Library Journal, LLC Used with permission.

    • Kirkus

      A White woman reflects on her role in the questionable conviction of a Black man for murder in this nonfiction debut. In Pennsylvania alone, more than 1,000 people are serving sentences of life without parole for murder in cases in which they did not directly kill a person but were accomplices in a crime that led to a death. Of those convicted, 70% are Black, including Frederick Muhammed Burton, the central figure of this book. When author Menaker first encountered Burton as a juror in his 1976 murder trial, during which he was charged with acting as an accomplice in the murders of two prison wardens, she was a self-described na�ve 24-year-old who grew up "in the 1950s and 1960s isolated in a world of Jewishness and white privilege." While subsequent jury duty notifications "triggered" uncomfortable memories of the trial, it wasn't until decades later that she fully came to terms with the ways her background and youth played a role in her support of a guilty verdict. This book covers Menaker's own personal journey as she confronted systemic racism and America's flawed criminal justice system. Menaker has spent recent years poring through archival evidence related to Burton's conviction. She makes some startling discoveries, including claims that his lawyer in the 1976 trial may have been intoxicated during court appearances. In the same case in which she served as a juror, the author notes conflicting testimonies ignored at the time, confusion over the judge's instructions to the jury, and a psychologically "traumatic" sequestering process that hampered the jury's ability to productively debate. At times overly focused on tangential details concerning the author's personal life, Menaker's account is a concisely written and deeply personal look into the ways that individuals blinkered by their personal backgrounds may help to perpetuate systemic inequities. A stirring, if occasionally self-indulgent, reexamination of a problematic murder trial.

      COPYRIGHT(2023) Kirkus Reviews, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. (Online Review)

Formats

  • Kindle Book
  • OverDrive Read
  • EPUB ebook

Languages

  • English

Loading